This rendering of the proposed Oliver Hotel at McBean Parkway and Valencia Boulevard is being revised after it was deemed too “plain” by the Planning Commission.
Share on FacebookTweet about this on TwitterEmail this to someonePrint this pageShare on RedditShare on Google+

The developer hoping to build a hotel at McBean Parkway and Valencia Boulevard has begun work on Plan B — after designs for Plan A left the Planning Commission underwhelmed by “rather plain” architecture derided as unworthy for one of Santa Clarita’s showcase intersections.

Developer Hunter Oliver intends to return before the Planning Commission by mid-November with revised plans, said a spokesman for the builder.

“We can do better,” Planning Commission member Charles Heffernan said back on Oct. 4, when the panel postponed approving the five-story, 134-room Oliver Hotel project on the site of the old Greens miniature golf course and restaurant.

“It’s not something I would put in the center of the city,” Heffernan added.

Tim Burkhart, vice chairperson of the commission, said the design that fell so flat on Oct. 4, “strikes me as rather plain – it looks like a dormitory.’’

So the commission, by a 3-1 vote with one member absent, told Oliver to make a number of aesthetic upgrades and return for the panel’s Nov. 15 meeting.

“We’ve had conversations with the applicant and given them directions,” said associate city planner David Peterson.

He said the suggested tweaks include:

* Greater variation in the heights of the roofline.

* More variation of building’s sand- and brick-toned color pattern.

* More details and embellishments on the ground floor and entry areas.

* Adding flourishes to window perimeters.

“It’s to add interest to the building,” Peterson said.

Oliver did not return a call from The Signal on Friday, but his attorney, Hunt C. Braly, confirmed the developer intends to return before the Planning Commission on Nov. 15 with revised plans.

“The city staff has outlined what they think needs to be done based on the Planning Commission meeting, and we’re working on that,” said Braly.

Braly had expressed frustration to the Commission at the Oct. 4 meeting — pointing out that the design the commissioners saw that night had already been spruced up according to recommendations from city planning staff and the city’s design consultant.

That should have been enough for approval, he said.

“We followed the process, we went back a number of times and came up with a plan we were told was acceptable, but the Planning Commission has the authority to ask more,” Braly said Friday.

“Now we’re going back to see what we can do.”

What will not change are most of the project’s larger parameters – the commission was OK with those, suggesting only the aesthetic fixes.

However it winds up looking, the hotel will be five stories and 60 feet tall at its highest point, with 134 rooms. There would also be a separate restaurant and a parking lot that includes 220 spaces.

The Oliver proposal is a scaled-down version a proposal first pitched by Sheraton in 2008 – a project that met with significant opposition from nearby residents.

That proposal — for a seven-story, 200-room hotel — was approved by the Planning Commission in 2009, but the approval was appealed to the City Council, which asked Sheraton to conduct further public outreach. Sheraton never responded to that request, and the project languished and eventually died.

Oliver bought the property this year and pursued the smaller project that’s now being debated.

kkenney@signalscv.com

(661) 287-5525

Share on FacebookTweet about this on TwitterEmail this to someonePrint this pageShare on RedditShare on Google+
Kevin Kenney
Over 30-plus years, Kevin Kenney has been a writer and editor for United Press International, the New York Post and Fox Sports, among other outlets. He joined The Signal in 2016.
Comments
By commenting, you agree to our terms and conditions.
  • How about not building it and creating LESS CONGESTION AND LESS TRAFFIC!!!!

  • tech

    That’s not how private property works, Ms. Taylor.

    Do you wish to buy the land with your own funds?

  • Chris Ball

    It’s an unimaginative design and as boring as it’s spokesman. The Planning Commission is right, but remember that a Camel is a Horse designed by a committee. What’s needed is a new architectural approach from somebody who doesn’t model with LEGOS. Stacking hotel room boxes is the cheapest way to build. A guest invited into your house may be asked to remove his shoes. Likewise, we might ask this developer not to earn his profits by cheapening our community. At least it doesn’t have a big CHUMP sign on it.

  • Chris, you got it right. It appears this developer doesn’t give a rat’s about our neighborhood. The building looks like the communist built apt buildings I saw all over Chinese cities. What a shame. I hope our city council stands firm and rejects this terrible building design again and again until it looks more like the Hyatt. The council should also not allow extended stays at this hotel as well. Look what happened at the Extended Stay hotel in Stevensons Ranch. It basically turned into a crime ridden dump. Fight on SCV council! ! deny, deny, deny this terrible eye sore.