Should the city have spent $354K to hold a special election to replace Acosta, rather than appointing someone?

By Signal Staff

Last update: Monday, December 19th, 2016

Click here to post a comment

Should the city have spent $354K to hold a special election to replace Acosta, rather than appointing someone?

About the author

Signal Staff

Signal Staff

  • Gene Walker

    The council should simply pick the person that came in third. Instead they are pretending the election never took place so they can hand pick the person that will just go along with whatever they want.

  • Alan Ferdman

    There are not enough choices. Add a place to check select the 3rd place candidate from the recent City Council election and you would get a better idea of what the public wants.

Signal Staff

Signal Staff