Share on FacebookTweet about this on TwitterEmail this to someonePrint this pageShare on RedditShare on Google+
Share on FacebookTweet about this on TwitterEmail this to someonePrint this pageShare on RedditShare on Google+
Comments
By commenting, you agree to our terms and conditions.
  • Ron Bischof

    How can one make that determination when governance isn’t fully defined and may not constitute the ability to affect policy or prohibit expenditures by bureaucratic agencies?

    • Gary Bierend

      Perhaps being on such a board would allow you the opportunity to make such a definition. If not, you can always be a whistle blower!

  • Frank Rizzo

    Bobs here…
    I wouldn’t be against being on the board. That said, the premise “to help ensure Measure H’s $355 million annual funding is spent responsibly on homeless services” is faulty. This is a government program that will have a huge infrastructure and waste. You would have to use the term “responsibly” very loosely.

    I used to work for the government. Nothing was done well.