Gary Horton: Thoughts on picked pockets
By Gary Horton
Tuesday, February 21st, 2017

Driving back from Oxnard this past Sunday, I passed a large field where dozens of Hispanic workers were busy picking vegetables on that cold, rainy Presidents Day weekend.

It looked miserable – wet, windy, chilly, yet out there they were, laboring along, part of a vast supply chain that brings you and me healthy, fresh vegetables to our table at prices we can afford – and prices to which we’re accustomed.

I wondered just how much farmers would have to pay to get you or me or our kids or just about anyone else to go out there to do back-breaking work on a cold, rainy holiday weekend.

These pickers are likely working for $10 an hour or less. They’re likely immigrants from a farm labor broker, moving from farm to farm as the harvest schedules dictate.

What will it take when our immigration authorities “crack down” and cut these folks out of our food chain? Then what will the farmers have to pay?  $15 an hour? $20 per hour? Are there even enough fit, warm bodies to harvest all our food in California once the “illegal aliens” are sent back home? Farmers are worried – and so should you be.

Labor represents about 15 percent of the cost of most foods. If farmers are able to find local, non-immigrant labor, you can count on a good, solid 25 percent rise in produce prices after all markups get factored in.

Worse, prices could soar should farmers face inadequate labor and shortages hit the market. Imagine – you’re paying double while produce rots in the fields because heavy handed, ill-considered immigration policies mandated we “get tough on immigrants” – even when these pickers are the folks feeding us and not the criminals such toughness seeks to get.

We should be careful what we wish for when we wish for blanket expulsions of vast quantities of hard workers in our food chains.

Another second thought for this Wednesday: The Signal has been reporting heavily on the upcoming Measure H – the “homeless initiative” intended to raise sales taxes by a quarter of a cent and thus generating $350 million per year, for 10 years, to be distributed through 21 separate services through roughly 5,000 square miles of L.A. County.

Various estimates have been offered by various sources on the cost of this tax, ranging from a handful of lattes a year for an individual to nearer $80 a year for a typical Santa Clarita Valley household. Sounds cheap and reasonable and why shouldn’t everyone be able to afford it?

Well, it’s not so easy. No one has yet spoken of the impact on local businesses. Businesses, remember, also pay sales tax on all sorts of things.

Contractors and builders pay sales tax on all materials going into your homes, parks and structures. Many firms, perhaps over 100 in the SCV alone, purchase 10 million, 20 million and more of taxable goods in the course of their operations.

Twenty million in purchases equates to an additional $50,000 in tax burden suddenly pressed on those who employee you and me. Who pays these costs?

You pay these costs. Everything gets marked up and passed along through many steps in business processes. Buying a new home? Expect Measure H to raise the price of your home $1,000-$2,000. Buying a new car? Toss in another $75 or more. On it goes while our firms get weighed down with one more giant chunk of cost.

There’s no free lunch, and Measure H will be one more straw to break local backs. Sooner or later the cost becomes too much and firms move on.

We know Measure H calls for raising taxes before backers even know exactly where and how the money will be spent. “Tax now, figure out later.”

That’s not a good plan for cost-effective management of public funds, and local businesses find Measure H a bitter pill as they shoulder the greatest portion of these costs with no assurances of benefit back to our local community.

Perhaps one day our homeless will be trained to pick the produce our federal government would have lay wasted and unpicked on farms near and far. It could happen, and that would be grand to see work out.

However, such visions seemed far-fetched as I drove past those rainy Oxnard farms with dozens of migrant workers bent over in the cold, biting rain.

Hook or crook, it looks like we should all buckle down for increased costs ahead. Whether it’s produce or taxes, your government is poised to lighten your pocketbook for reasons not fully considered by those picking your pockets.

Gary Horton is a Santa Clarita resident. “Full Speed to Port!” appears Wednesdays in The Signal.

About the author

Gary Horton

Gary Horton

Gary Horton: Thoughts on picked pockets

Driving back from Oxnard this past Sunday, I passed a large field where dozens of Hispanic workers were busy picking vegetables on that cold, rainy Presidents Day weekend.

It looked miserable – wet, windy, chilly, yet out there they were, laboring along, part of a vast supply chain that brings you and me healthy, fresh vegetables to our table at prices we can afford – and prices to which we’re accustomed.

I wondered just how much farmers would have to pay to get you or me or our kids or just about anyone else to go out there to do back-breaking work on a cold, rainy holiday weekend.

These pickers are likely working for $10 an hour or less. They’re likely immigrants from a farm labor broker, moving from farm to farm as the harvest schedules dictate.

What will it take when our immigration authorities “crack down” and cut these folks out of our food chain? Then what will the farmers have to pay?  $15 an hour? $20 per hour? Are there even enough fit, warm bodies to harvest all our food in California once the “illegal aliens” are sent back home? Farmers are worried – and so should you be.

Labor represents about 15 percent of the cost of most foods. If farmers are able to find local, non-immigrant labor, you can count on a good, solid 25 percent rise in produce prices after all markups get factored in.

Worse, prices could soar should farmers face inadequate labor and shortages hit the market. Imagine – you’re paying double while produce rots in the fields because heavy handed, ill-considered immigration policies mandated we “get tough on immigrants” – even when these pickers are the folks feeding us and not the criminals such toughness seeks to get.

We should be careful what we wish for when we wish for blanket expulsions of vast quantities of hard workers in our food chains.

Another second thought for this Wednesday: The Signal has been reporting heavily on the upcoming Measure H – the “homeless initiative” intended to raise sales taxes by a quarter of a cent and thus generating $350 million per year, for 10 years, to be distributed through 21 separate services through roughly 5,000 square miles of L.A. County.

Various estimates have been offered by various sources on the cost of this tax, ranging from a handful of lattes a year for an individual to nearer $80 a year for a typical Santa Clarita Valley household. Sounds cheap and reasonable and why shouldn’t everyone be able to afford it?

Well, it’s not so easy. No one has yet spoken of the impact on local businesses. Businesses, remember, also pay sales tax on all sorts of things.

Contractors and builders pay sales tax on all materials going into your homes, parks and structures. Many firms, perhaps over 100 in the SCV alone, purchase 10 million, 20 million and more of taxable goods in the course of their operations.

Twenty million in purchases equates to an additional $50,000 in tax burden suddenly pressed on those who employee you and me. Who pays these costs?

You pay these costs. Everything gets marked up and passed along through many steps in business processes. Buying a new home? Expect Measure H to raise the price of your home $1,000-$2,000. Buying a new car? Toss in another $75 or more. On it goes while our firms get weighed down with one more giant chunk of cost.

There’s no free lunch, and Measure H will be one more straw to break local backs. Sooner or later the cost becomes too much and firms move on.

We know Measure H calls for raising taxes before backers even know exactly where and how the money will be spent. “Tax now, figure out later.”

That’s not a good plan for cost-effective management of public funds, and local businesses find Measure H a bitter pill as they shoulder the greatest portion of these costs with no assurances of benefit back to our local community.

Perhaps one day our homeless will be trained to pick the produce our federal government would have lay wasted and unpicked on farms near and far. It could happen, and that would be grand to see work out.

However, such visions seemed far-fetched as I drove past those rainy Oxnard farms with dozens of migrant workers bent over in the cold, biting rain.

Hook or crook, it looks like we should all buckle down for increased costs ahead. Whether it’s produce or taxes, your government is poised to lighten your pocketbook for reasons not fully considered by those picking your pockets.

Gary Horton is a Santa Clarita resident. “Full Speed to Port!” appears Wednesdays in The Signal.