Share on FacebookTweet about this on TwitterEmail this to someonePrint this pageShare on RedditShare on Google+

This is a crazy election year with many difficult choices. From my perspective, one of the most challenging decisions was whom to vote for in the 38th Assembly District.

This race features Dante Acosta, a Republican, against Christy Smith, a Democrat. Quite frankly, whoever wins will have big shoes to fill as Scott Wilk has demonstrated considerable leadership as our Assembly representative.

In July I was undecided but was leaning toward voting for Mrs. Smith.

My reasoning was simple.

Personally, I have been disappointed with Councilman Acosta’s support of the Laemmle Theater subsidies and that he has not been proactive in dealing with the recently uncovered city embezzlement.

He takes the view that the embezzlement was merely an isolated incident that the city needs to put behind it. Thus he was not my ideal candidate.

As to Mrs. Smith, I attended The Signal debate in August with an open mind. During the debate, she assured everyone that she would cast her votes independently of the Democratic Party’s wishes.

She painted herself as a centrist who is open to discussion with people on all sides of the political spectrum. She indicated ambivalence to Proposition 55, stating that the state needs to adopt a more stable tax base.

All of this sounded pretty good.

However, in the closing part of the debate she switched her approach and started saying things about Mr. Acosta which, quite frankly, I find offensive. Instead of discussing substance, her tactics changed to smearing her opponent.

Since The Signal debate, Mrs. Smith has apparently changed her tune on Proposition 55, as she now endorses it. So much for supporting meaningful tax reform.

Now let’s consider the likelihood that Mrs. Smith will vote independently of the Democratic Party line. Her campaign is everywhere. Signs and advertisements supporting her are ubiquitous.

Her campaign is well funded. Who is funding it? Clearly, the Democratic Party thinks it can turn the 38th Assembly District blue, so it is heavily funding her campaign.

With all of that funding, do you really think she will be able to resist voting the party line?

Mrs. Smith campaigns on her record with the Newhall School District. When I studied the SCV school bond situation several months ago, it became apparent that the Newhall School District made the most judicious use of capital appreciation bonds (“CABs”) of any school district in the SCV.

CABs are bonds that are the most expensive way to finance school construction. In 2012, AB 132 was enacted in an attempt to reign in abuses posed by CABs.

Since 2012, the Newhall School District has issued several CABs that appear to be structured to circumvent the limitations imposed by AB 132. This makes it difficult to argue that she has exercised fiscal responsibility during her tenure on the school board and sets a concerning precedent about how she will vote on fiscal measures if elected.

Finally, she made a huge issue out of Mr. Acosta’s business record as a financial adviser. Specifically, she cited three complaints registered with the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) against him.

These complaints are common and, apparently, those filed against Mr. Acosta were settled without sanctions.

Mr. Acosta explained that these complaints are routine, yet Mrs. Smith kept pursuing them. Ironically, Mrs. Smith’s husband, who is also a financial adviser, had two FINRA complaints filed against him.

Mrs. Smith’s response is that her husband is not running for office, so any comments about him should be off limits. Maybe so, but it clearly demonstrates that these complaints are routine, validating Mr. Acosta’s defense against her claims.

Mr. Acosta has a long record of community service. I suspect that, if elected, he will follow Republican Party lines, which is important as the state would move farther to the left if the Democrats get a super-majority in the Assembly as a result of winning this seat.

After looking long and hard at this election, I decided I will take my chances with Mr. Acosta. My pocketbook cannot afford a Democratic super-majority in the Legislature.

Jim de Bree is a Valencia resident.

Share on FacebookTweet about this on TwitterEmail this to someonePrint this pageShare on RedditShare on Google+
By commenting, you agree to our terms and conditions.
  • Brian Baker

    I’m with you, Jim.

    • indy

      Unfortunately, most politicians support their party’s ideology positions since if they don’t they don’t move up the party ladder nor get any financial support.

      I’d like to know their educational backgrounds . . . do either have any management training?

      Likewise, while community service is great but it doesn’t out of hand indicate whether the person wanting to be a legislator has enough economic or management knowledge to partake in the multi-billion dollar state budget.

      Overall, as long as we continue to manage government based on beliefs or political ideology, nobody is going to be satisfied.

      We need government run by ‘demonstrations’ of policy proposals and then determine if they work or not.

      Simply reciting ideology based intentions has failed us . . .

      • Brian Baker

        And exactly WHY is this inane regurgitation of your usual talking points posted as a reply to my comment, wIndybag?

        Is this comment board THAT difficult for you to comprehend? You need some “management training” in basic tech.

        • Please stop with the insulting language. Just because Donald J. Trump does it, does not mean that insults, all caps and snide comments are acceptable. Please stop aping Mr. Trump and sleazy political websites. . Thanks.

          • tech

            Brian isn’t “aping” anyone, Mr. Zelig, so “nationalizing” the comments section seems off base. I know him personally and this is his unique persona. He’s been online here for years and he’s straight up, no ice or seltzer. Read his Op-Ed columns for confirmation of this fact.

            I haven’t seen your name here before so I’m assuming you’re unfamiliar with Indy’s modus operandi as well.

            Stick around. You’ll find it illuminating.

          • indy

            Many conservatives here like the guy above and below, can’t support their failing conservative ideology thus they resort to demeaning anyone who ‘dare’ disagree with them.

            And rather ‘debate’ the issues, they feel that simply character assassinating anyone who disagrees with them to be appropriate and they have done that for years here.

            This is in line with the type of Trump ‘bullying’ . . . or rage ‘tweeting’ . . . further polluting our political discourse with hatreds, innuendo and speculations, none of which address the reality facing us.

            In any event, I don’t respond to their nonsense anymore . . . these folks are free to spout their beliefs and I’ll respond and clarify their distortions as appropriate.

  • noonan

    Like our presidential candidates, neither are desirable.

    • indy

      I find this comment interesting since both nominees got the majority of the votes . . . so the public is ‘demanding’ they be the ones to consider . . . just like when you spend your money on something, you’re telling the supplier of same that you like the product.

      • tech

        Non sequitur, Indy.

        Have you considered that open primaries can lead to cross party votes and the majorities you cite may be skewed accordingly? Or that general election voters aren’t necessarily that same as those who participated in primaries?

        I concur with Noonan. None of the general election candidates are fit for office.

  • tech

    Concur for the reasons you stated in your column, Jim. Adding to the de facto Single Party State will not reform legislative abuses such as gut and amend, last minute bill amendments, secretive negotiations between the Governor, Senate and Assembly Leaders, etc.

    Heterogeneity and robust diversity of thought is healthy for our polity. Political monocultures induce stagnation and corruption.

  • I just want to see Smith get that smug smile wiped off her lying face.