Paul Raggio | Measuring leadership competence

Commentary
Share on facebook
Share
Share on twitter
Tweet
Share on email
Email

E Pluribus Unum, our former national motto — out of many, one — almost everything we do in life, we do as a team, starting with being born into a family, progressing to a school, maturing in the workplace, participating in a church, and retiring in a community. We interact with and combine our talents and resources with others while navigating life’s journey. Teams are dynamic — continually gaining or losing members; complicating or simplifying goals; increasing or decreasing standards; adding or subtracting values; praising or sullying reputations; hiring competent or firing incompetent leaders.  

Members have expectations that being on a team offers distinction, growth, advancement, rewards, satisfaction, safety, competition and self-worth. Business owners have hopes that highly motivated, diversified teams, led by competent leaders, create one source of energy to operate at the most efficient and effective yield to maximize profits. Competent leaders maximize the potential of every team member and create an unbelievable synergy that amplifies productivity and growth.  

How do you measure leader competence? Many of us put several acronyms after our name to announce to the public our level of expertise: CEO, COO, CFO, VP, AVP, SVP, Ph.D., LLD, MBA, MD, PMP, RMP and the list goes on and on. Public services, such as fire or law enforcement, use rank insignia, unit patches, ribbons and medals as a visual sign of competence. 

And why shouldn’t we? Before we meet with a doctor, attorney, tax adviser, financial planner or the like, we go to the internet and try to determine the prospective professional’s level of competence. We seek the most competent when it comes to our health, legal or financial well-being … we don’t want a brain surgeon performing open-heart surgery on us. 

Boards of directors and executive-level management do the same thing when hiring a leader. Failing this task jeopardizes the health of the organization and may ultimately result in its downfall. I’ve experienced lousy leadership hires that had an extraordinary impact on the organization: team member productivity, creativity and generosity eroded, and critical personnel bailed. The organization went into a death spiral, ultimately collapsing because bad leadership was not replaced soon enough.  

One of the hardest tasks for a leader when hiring or promoting an individual to a critical position is avoiding the “Peter Principle.” The principle, developed by Laurence J. Peter, and written about by Raymond Hull, posits that, eventually, given enough positions in a hierarchy and time, we will be promoted to a level of our incompetence, or plateau. Peter argues that if you are competent at your job, you will earn consideration for promotion to the next level of competence. Assuming you are promoted, and over time successful, you will be considered for promotion to the next level of power. The cycle will continue until you reach your level of incompetence. I’ve seen Peter’s principle played out many times while in the Army and private sector, often asking how that individual ever got selected to that position of responsibility lacking so much competence. 

The best leader hires are ones where they are competent to perform in the requisite position. Competence means having the appropriate knowledge, skills and ability — and necessary judgment, emotional intelligence, decision-making, communication, and cultural and collaboration attributes — to successfully lead a team at a specific organizational stratification.

There is no more significant consequential decision than selecting a leader — no matter at the highest levels of our federal, state and local governments, Fortune 500 companies, mom-and-pop retail outlets or nonprofit organizations in our community. Far better to take a very formal, deliberate, contemplative approach to this selection, than an informal, casual, unreflective method. The consequences of a lousy leadership selection will reverberate through the organization and have the potential to set back the growth trajectory for years. Find the right leader, and out of many, you make one. This is how you lead, think, plan and act. 

Paul A. Raggio is co-owner, with his sister Lisa, of One True North INC Leadership and Business Coaching Solutions.

Advertisement

Related To This Story

Latest NEWS