Letters to the Editor

Letters to the Editor

Betty Arenson | Community Newspaper Open to All

The Signal’s Jan. 31 opinion page was entertaining.  One reader felt the need to explain there are three branches of government and Trump alone caused the recent partial shutdown; ignoring

Letters to the Editor

Taryn Cain | Keep Those Columns Coming

To Tim Whyte: First things first, GREAT article.  (“The First Amendment: Yes, It’s for Everyone,” Jan. 27). I couldn’t agree with you more. Our country has become a mess and

Letters to the Editor

Richard Meyers | An Investment Tip

Investors take note: It’s been said that when it comes to investing “There is no such thing as a SURE THING.” I’m here to tell you that is no longer

Letters to the Editor

Lee Uber | Apology Owed to Hill, Democrats

The Signal editorial board has never been more factually incorrect than they were in their attempts to lay blame for the recent government shutdown at the feet of Democrats (“ICYMI:

Letters to the Editor

Rickey John Sandoval | Just More Breitbart?

When we purchased our home in Newhall last year, I became excited that The Signal was to have a Sunday edition coming out and eagerly awaited reading hometown news. However,

Letters to the Editor

Raagib Quraishi | A Head-Shaker of an Editorial

If our founding fathers had read the editorial board’s stance on the government shutdown (Jan. 27), first they would’ve shook their heads because this is definitely not how our democracy

Letters to the Editor

Gerald Staack | Class Warfare Is a Real Threat

Throughout history, no matter which form of government was in power, the poor and the middle class have always been under the thumb of aristocracy. Today, aristocracy, mainly affixed in

Letters to the Editor

Jim Loken | Hate Comes from Both Sides

Re: Betty Arenson commentary, Jan. 19: Ms. Arenson writes as if hate resides in one party. But that infection taints all humanity and the examples she uses could easily fill

Letters to the Editor

Ken Dean | Seeking Transparency on Taxes

There seems to be a continuation of the controversy about the landscaping and lighting district assessment.  Some, in some areas, pay $12.38 and others in other areas pay $81.69. This